All the avis are scrunched
One of the admins broke it as a funny joke
(due to an ewiz suggestion that it was unfair out of game info in mafia games - as a member of the ewiz cult please consider this before forming your opinions)
this does make sense though
-
Approach every internet discussion as an argument/debate. Your objective is to win, not to understand or discuss
-
Be willing to share personal info from your life in order to win arguments,
2a. but call foul if anyone cites the same info in an argument against you.
2b. Only share positive info from your life and present it in a way which reinforces your arguments.
(for example, if you were an alcoholic and severely drunk through several experiences you were saying "I Was There, I Remember It" for, that should only come up when faced with actual logs which disprove what you were saying)
2c. Remember the audience is inclined to be cowed by minimal achievements and doesn't have the expertise to discredit you, so you don't have 1 or 2 years of experience on the job, you are the local expert who does this for his work. You don't have an undergrad degree and a few postgrad classes, you are a high-level academic who is published in several papers. -
Speak with absolute certainty on every topic. Your goal is to reinforce your original assumptions, not learn new info. It helps if you can google for sources that support you or cite obscure texts. It does not matter if you misinterpret because most users will not be able to tell or will be bullied out of the discussion by your insistence that you know the material.
-
When you encounter people who do not buy the hype, do not worry! If you argue for long enough and throw in enough insults they will eventually get bored and walk away. It helps to discredit them as trolls, reactionaries, or just call them a bunch of names to signal to your readers that these are not opinions they need to take seriously.
-
When you do encounter anything that directly contradicts you, reframe, don't admit fault. Challenge semantics. Adjust your argument to claim your point was something else. Remember to call the person presenting the info some names so that it will be clear that you were not presented with something new, just another person who didn't understand your argument.
Kind of bored of writing rules but if anyone can think of any others feel free to chip in
- Poop in cups and serve them to your defeated foes
1 Like
You skipped 6
sounds like ben shapiro
i want ben shapiro to appropriate bzzt wrongo
2 Likes
6 is that you need to really need this. When challenged it needs to be an existential level threat that, if left un-crushed, would result in some sort of mental breakdown and series of vulgar insults. This isn't a space for idle masturbatory cults of personality
6 is one of the devils numbers
This is a perfect example of a well executed rule 5
I feel like ben shapiro is exactly ewiz just right wing
Ben shapiro lives in an internet debate club
I think you're doing alright but need more insults
I strongly believe 4 is where the insults work best but maybe it’s because I’m sophisticated
but he makes money for it so its respectable. as an amoral capitalist if you make money and dont get arrested for it sounds legit to me
if it wasnt shapiro someone else would fill his pseudointellectual niche
It's not just a devil's number. It's that I, personally, am an agent of the devil for presenting you with the number six. And I need to define the order in which the real numbers go.
1 Like
The real numbers are a scam just like the fruit of knowledge was a scam
No longer shall I be scammed