Cops are trained to see every situation as a potential violent encounter and to constantly be in fear for their lives
It's a real problem. Somehow I doubt it gets solved by writing "Send all cops to piggy heaven" on courthouses and throwing IEDs at them but I guess that's just me jumping to silly conclusions again
Milliken v. Bradley gutted desegregation. Shelby County v. Holder gutted the Voting Rights Act. Police violence against black people is hugely disproportionate and goes unpunished for the most part. The prison-industrial complex speaks for itself. Care to tell me how it was successful?
Once again, I provide a shitload of arguments, citing specific cases, and you have absolutely nothing of value to say. You're too fucking stupid to construct an argument.
Hey, dumbfuck, you never responded to anything Gamut posted. You never responded to anything I posted. You are a complete dumbfuck and your opinion here is worthless until you provide a meaningful argument or evidence that anything you're saying has any merit.
So your solution is to fund the police more so they can get trained differently? Fundamentally, policing is an institution built to protect private property. It stems from slave patrols in the US. It will always serve the interests of capital which is, guess what, protecting the rich and oppressing the poor. Guess what race is disproportionately poor.
Hey, @theGreatWingdingi, what do you think of this? How do you reconcile it with your portrayal of King as never acknowledging violence as a legitimate tactic?
ironically this makes me more sympathetic towards the System because people who set things on fire should be arrested. so if activists actually do set things on fire since its the only play, it only makes sense to arrest activists and use the fbi to track their activities. and also since personally my life is good i also am not in a position to support setting things on fire since i am more devoted to order than to justice.
we should just solve things within the capitalist paradigm by mailing people checks
Only one death – that of Clayton Crawford near Whitecourt, Alta. in July 2018 – resulted in charges being laid. After a nearly two-year investigation by the Alberta Serious Incident Response Team (ASIRT), two RCMP officers were charged earlier this month with criminal negligence causing death.
According to ASIRT's report, an off-duty RCMP officer found Crawford asleep in a vehicle at a rest stop near Whitecourt. The officer believed the vehicle was the "distinctive" one police were looking for in connection with a shooting the previous day in Valhalla Centre, Alta., more than 300 kilometres away.
The off-duty officer reported his suspicion to his working colleagues. When they approached the vehicle, ASIRT found, there was a confrontation and Crawford tried to drive away. Two officers fired at the vehicle, which soon crashed. Crawford, who had been hit by more than one shot, died.
It is not clear why the Crown believes the actions of the officers amount to criminal negligence causing death, and the allegations against the officers have not been tested in court. Both officers were on active duty before the charges were laid but have since been suspended with pay.
yes im just saying you cannot gauge the extent of the problem using those statistics unless you have a competing figure for the proportion of truly unjustified shootings compared to the ones successfully prosecuted.
I think it's pretty clear the US has a giant shooting problem that gun control could help solve, but it's not enough by itself. The real issue is media blowing every shooter up to celebrity status, and they're too obsessed with money to stop.