the republican position is some, cognitive ideal of
A) these people become wards of the state and further legitimize the existence of these programs and the government itself (as a NEET, this is true).
B) this could be better served by the private sector (removal of bureaucracy).
C) the government shouldn't be a jobs program.
i dunno, what the sort of "abstract class" for what the government is something that monopolizes force for external force and the validation of property rights.
I've read like 20 pages of this book but it'd probably be worthwhile to read.
another really funny factor is that like 15% of people in America are just not able to function in a modern day society and the government just has to do something with them lmao
well if you want to focus on doing stuff that aids capitalism and doesn't hinder it then you can't really do this because it would fuck over so many companies. You would probably even find a worse situation occurring where we outsource even more work.
also this stuff would never be able to happen in a bear market which we might be majorly in for a while
Stock market collapses overnight, companies restructure to start business in the US again as it makes economic sense to hire US workers, wages go up as there is an increased demand for US workers who no longer are competing with Mexicans
I agree that establishing a security net is a fucking struggle and hasn't worked out well, but I believe it doesn't mean we shouldn't try to do better cuz a good solution doesn't just happen, its iterated towards
Having some company where you’re outsourcing everything to cheap Latin American countries or China and then importing shitty goods to sell to consumers doesn’t actually bring any value and is how you end up with CEOs making 300x their lowest paid employee
at the very least partial employment of US employees and taxes. In the scenario you describe the company will tank, likely immediately release plenty of US employees, restructure and ultimately be capped in potential revenue compared to what wouldve happened without it (and offer even lower wages than before as "we have to to make a profit sadface")
i might be wrong but the good companies that make strong profits due to some globalistic approach could move to one of their foreign offices. in general plenty of companies can't do this but they're the same companies that don't really make large profits and hire foreigners in the first place