State of the Forum: 2023

Good night!

Isn't this just super fucking logical? AIDS is less of a threat and there are preventative drugs you can take that reduce the chance of even catching it.

So...

Why is this surprising to you? What point is this even supposed to prove? It's completely logical lmao

You linked me a bunch of meaningless shit that proves none of the points you're trying to make. Not a one. It's the shitty equivalent of a document dump, because I have to actually sit here and read these things and point out all the various ways in which you're a fucking moron, which takes me about 10x as long as it takes you to post and find the thing. It's a great way to never have to "admit defeat" in an argument because the other person tends to just get bored and leave.

I failed you in my task, and I most humbly beg your forgiveness.

ah yes, the tried and true tactic of revealing how big of a brainlet you are to make the other party feel bad.

mission 1 of the byzantine bari campaign is pretty tough

not to interrupt the conversation about how much you guys think about gay people it's just a difficult mission on hard

1 Like

there are only a few people on this forum capable of thinking.

1 Like

yea yea true true really hadn't thought of that

one of my highschool friends used to unironically scream 'think better' when he would get tilted in our gamebattles matches

1 Like

The point is that gays are degenerate sex addicts

Gay isn’t a genetic thing either

And yes, trannies/gays are groomers

1 Like

Insom would love nothing more than to have every gay couple on the planet to adopt a brown skinned third world boy and raise them in white countries

Aren't you religious? Can I introduce you to an institution known as the Catholic church?

A NY Post article about a single couple? That's the best you came up with in 6 hours? I'm fucking disappointed in you

"Online user yns proposed an interesting theory, that gay people are predisposed to being degenerate sex addicts. He came to this conclusion, in part, because of the (unverifiable) data he diligently collected, and compared it to dozens of other studies of heterosexual couples (studies not provided), he theorized that the differing rates of 'sexual deviancy' (rate not given), although not a 'genetic thing', are actually because of (reason not stated)."

Damn, when you put it like that it's real convincing. Good stuff bud.

Are we linking articles again?

And of course you get the first Pope in ages that doesn't seem like an outright bigot and actually spreads a message of love and acceptance.... and you fucking denounce the Pope! Hysterical!

Yea that's exactly my point. That's what I said in my post

? None of what I said was remotely hateful, why are you being homophobic?

On the contrary, what LBJ said was completely over the line (talked about specific members of the website, who are actively reading the thread, participating in vulgar sex acts - this is sexual harassment and is against the rules ever since the Nyte days) and what I said is pretty tame (generalizations about gay people as a group based on statistics and my personal experiences (non-gay) with gay people (no homo)). For some reason you read me talking about group behavior of gays as targeted harassment and then read actual targeted harassment and are completely OK with it.